Home > Stories > Natural capital > From invisible to investable: turning nature into an asset class

From expert led to data-driven natural resource management

Summary

Traditional expert-driven natural resource management planning is costly and opaque. Co-design has improved inclusivity but risks being unscientific. The Natural Capital Suite enables a new model—data-driven planning. By combining scientific rigour with inclusivity, its Region, Project, and Market web apps reduce costs, build trust and empower communities to shape resilient landscapes.

7 min read

Authors: Nick Marsh

The problem with traditional planning

For decades, natural resource management (NRM) planning has been expert-driven. Specialists design strategies behind closed doors, using bespoke approaches that are often opaque to communities, landholders, and even many decision-makers.
This approach creates several problems:

  • High transaction costs: More than half of funding can be absorbed by administration, consultants, and compliance—leaving less for on-ground works.
  • Lack of transparency: Stakeholders rarely see how decisions are made and priorities are set.
  • Limited inclusivity: Communities and landholders feel excluded from shaping priorities.
  • Poor replicability: Each plan is one-off, making it hard to repeat or scale across regions.

The result? A system that feels top-down, costly and disconnected from the people it is meant to serve.

The limitations of co-design

In response to these problems, “co-design” has emerged as an alternative. The idea is to involve landholders, community groups, and stakeholders in planning from the start. While this is well-intentioned, co-design carries its own limitations:

  • Not science-driven: Co-design often prioritises local perspectives or preferences over evidence-based modelling.
  • Risk of bias: The loudest voices in the room can steer decisions, regardless of ecological outcomes.
  • Inconsistency: Each co-design process is different, meaning results are difficult to compare or replicate across regions.

Co-design improves inclusivity, but without a strong scientific backbone, it risks creating plans that are popular yet may be ineffective in delivering real environmental outcomes.

Toward data-driven planning and implementation

The alternative is a data-driven approach that combines the inclusivity of co-design but is backed by science. By using transparent, standardised models, stakeholders can see how different actions stack up, question assumptions, compare trade-offs, and ultimately trust that decisions are rooted in evidence.

This is the foundation for the true democratisation of NRM, where everyone can participate in evidence-based planning.

How the Natural Capital Suite helps

The Natural Capital Suite provides this data-driven, science-backed foundation through its three core web apps:

    • Operates at the regional scale to set strategic priorities.
    • Uses standardised, transparent models to compare environmental, social,
      cultural, and economic outcomes.
    • Reduces transaction costs by replacing bespoke, consultant-heavy
      processes with repeatable, evidence-based planning that is accessible to
      stakeholders.
    • Produces shareable output that can be workshopped and reviewed.
    • Builds internal capacity for future planning and prioritisation.
    • Works at the local scale, turning regional priorities into farm and
      community-level projects.
    • Records outputs (e.g. trees planted) and links them to expected outcomes
      using established science.
    • Empowers landholders to contribute without needing to master complex
      modelling.
    • Connects projects to funding, allowing the funders to decide on
      priorities.
    • Reduces the high transaction costs of market participation by
      standardising project outcome quantification.
    • Ensures more of every dollar flows to on-ground impact.

Together, these web apps deliver scientifically robust, transparent and inclusive planning, without the pitfalls of expert-only or co-design-only approaches.

Why data-driven matters

When NRM planning is data-driven:

  • Trust grows: Communities and investors can see and understand the basis for decisions.
  • Efficiency improves: Less money wasted on overheads, more invested in land repair.
  • Scalability increases: The same methods can be applied consistently across regions.
  • Adoption strengthens: Landholders see clearly how their work contributes to broader goals.
  • Capacity builds: Skills and knowledge are shared, empowering communities to lead and sustain change.

Closing thought

Expert-driven planning is opaque and can be costly. Co-design is inclusive but risks being unscientific and inconsistent. The future lies in data-driven planning—transparent, standardised, and science-backed, yet inclusive and accessible enough for all stakeholders to participate.

The Natural Capital Suite makes this future possible through its web apps Region, Project, and Market, as it lowers costs, increases trust, and empowers communities to shape their landscapes on a foundation of evidence.

Read similar stories